I think we live in a
time where people don't know what to do with themselves. And yeah,
that includes me. I think we have a difficult time finding fulfilment
because we are given messages that we can achieve anything we want if
we put our minds to it, but the truth is that most of us just carry
on trying to survive and as such, we find ourselves unsatisfied by
the daily grind. This dissatisfaction is both a good and bad thing.
It's a good thing in that it pushes some of us to better ourselves
and achieve our goals, but it can also be a bad thing in that it can
take the joy out of the more average things in people's lives that
can also be rewarding. Jeff, Who Lives At Home is a film that
explores this from a number of points of view.
The movie starts with
Jeff (Jason Segel) pondering the meaning of life, refusing to believe
that he was destined to be the underachiever that he's been so far.
He speaks of the movie Signs, noting that the film was trying
to say that everything in life has a purpose even if we don't
understand it just yet. So, when underwhelming events of that way
cause him to pursue the name “Kevin,” he finds himself on an
unlikely journey that has him run into his older brother Pat (Ed
Helms) who is having trouble in his marriage after buying a fancy new
car against his wife's wishes. Now, he suspects her of cheating on
him and wants Jeff to help him find out the truth.
The film explores three
lives in very different places, but each suffering from a similar
affliction. Jeff is, by society's standards, a complete failure. He
is a 30 year old still living in his mom's basement and can't even
muster the inspiration to go out to the store. He doesn't like his
life and where it is. Pat however, has by society's standards,
progressed in life and might be considered a success as he has a
stable but modest job and is married. However, he is very unhappy
also. Their mother, Sharon (Susan Sarandon), has spent much of her
life at the same job and has no idea what to do with her sons. But
most of all, she just feels like she wound up in a life that she
never intended to be in and is disappointed. None of the characters
are content with where they are, despite having achieved varying
levels of what some might consider successes or failures.
I suppose Jeff, Who
Lives At Home asks the question of why we find ourselves so
unhappy with life, and gives us a glimpse into these quirky
characters' lives and we see what happens when they take their fate
into their own hands and pursue their happiness, whether they know it
or not. It explores the idea of destiny and whether or not it can be
obtained as long as one is seeking it. Were the events propelled by a
higher order or was it because Jeff took the steps to seek it out
that the events played out as they did?
It is written and
directed by the brothers Jay and Mark Duplass, who are known for
making understated films about unusual family situations, though I
must confess that I haven't seen Cyrus or Baghead. This
film makes me want to see them though because I thought that Jeff,
Who Lives At Home was a very well thought out movie that was
surprisingly funny and offered a lot of insight into inner struggles
in both individuals and relationships. It's the kind of deep film
where it doesn't try to hit you over the head with what it's trying
to say, which I really appreciate. It works because it has a story to
tell and good characters to keep you invested in it.
The actors do a good
job with the material. Jason Segel doesn't play the same guy that he
often does. Jeff isn't as charming and doesn't have himself together.
He's a bit more of a melancholy character, and while his naive view
on life seems a bit exaggerated, it isn't completely unbelievable and
I think much of that is thanks to Segel's likeability as an actor.
Ed Helms is also good in the role, though he treads on familiar
territory, reminding me much of his character in The Office.
Thankfully Pat is less dimwitted. Helms can do a very impressive
balancing act by playing men who are frustrating to watch, but also
likeable enough to warrant sympathy.
If there was one thing
that distracted me from the film, it would be the cinematography.
There were a lot of shaky camera shots with sudden zoom ins and outs,
and when I first saw this technique I couldn't quite wrap my head
around it. And it continued to happen through the film so it seemed
to be a choice rather than a botched up shot. It looked
unprofessional, to be honest, but once the story got moving, I
started to adjust to this strange choice and came to accept it.
Someone said that there was a specific shot at the end of the film
which seemed to justify that stylistic choice, but I think I missed
it when I was sipping my drink or something. Shame. Perhaps I'll
have to watch it again.
Jeff, Who Lives At
Home surpassed my expectations and was a great demonstration of
low-key film making that works because it's a story that has
something to say and characters that move the story forward. It's not
a masterpiece, but it's not intending to be. It is a film worth
seeing though, particularly if you find yourself trying to find
meaning in the struggle of life... or if your name is Kevin.
4 Stars
No comments:
Post a Comment