If The Artist does just one thing right, it
captures the look and feel of a classic silent movie from the 1920's.
This is clever on a number of levels because the film takes place at
the end of the silent era and explores the changes of cinema at that
time. It followed George Valentin (Jean Dujardin), one of the biggest
silent film stars in Hollywood. In an encounter with a young actress
named Peppy Miller (Bérénice Bejo), he unknowingly starts off
acting her career. However, not long after that, a big step in cinema
is being made. Movies are becoming talkies. George doesn't believe
that this trend with catch on, but Peppy steps up to the challenge
and signs up with a studio set on making her a star. Mr. Valentin
however leaves the studio and goes to finance his own silent movie,
putting everything of his on the line.
I think this movie connected with me in a way that
I didn't really understand until after a little bit of reflection.
The movie's theme is "out with the old, in with the new."
George is a loveable protagonist, even if his ego is a bit too large
for his own good. Big changes are intimidating, especially for those
who are the best at what they do currently, and the idea of becoming
obsolete can be unbearable to many. The audience knows that talking
picture will forever change cinema because it's common place now, but
George wants to fight it. I think a lot of people will at least
understand where he is coming from. He sees what he does as a
timeless art form, while others see it as archaic. Isn't it
interesting how the style of this film is novelty to the point where
there is Oscar buzz over Dujardin's performance? Dujardin is
validating his character's opinion by showing the world that it takes
skill to perform in that way, now that it is no longer common place.
The Artist is strangely self fulfilling.
Back on the subject of how I connected with the
movie, I feel that, while The Artist is about a very specific
time in cinema's history, the conflict that George is going through
is very universal and just as relevant today. For example, I worked
as a projectionist at a movie theatre. Cinemas are going through a
big change right now as most of them have switched over the digital
projectors replacing the classic 35mm film projectors. Essentially, I
lost my job to this advancement in technology. Of course, this comes
with its own problems, but I might write an article about that
subject some day soon. The point is that I could understand
Valentin's fear and reluctance toward change. And I doubt I'm the
only one.
Strangely enough, The Artist deals with
some heavy issues and I didn't even think about it all that much
until later. I was just along for the ride while the film was
playing. It deals with rejection, divorce, alcoholism, depression,
and issues along those lines, but it doesn't feel very heavy. It
mostly maintains a very light tone and keeps a good sense of humour
throughout. It's not that it comes across as false, nor does it
understate the severity of the problems; it just allows the style to
carry the movie through the darker territory. That's a fine line to
walk and the movie dances joyfully on it.
I might need to watch it again. I liked it, but
I'm not sure if I loved it. I certainly believe that The Artist
is a clever and fun movie with a lot of heart. It really feels like
a love letter to the silent era of cinema and the stars of that time.
It's the exact movie that it intended to be and it accomplishes a
lot. What more should I ask it to be?
4 sour grapes
No comments:
Post a Comment